Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Revealed December 2010
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX10
- Replacement is Samsung NX20
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX11, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is very similar but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX11 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was manufactured 3 years later than the NX11 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-M1 scores against the NX11 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung NX11. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX11
| WG-M1 | NX11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | December 2010 | More recent by 46 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| NX11 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 115k | Sharper display (+499k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX11
| WG-M1 | NX11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX11 has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") having a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX11 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 versus the NX11.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and NX11 is 91 and 80 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and NX11.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX11 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX11 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 11.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 499g (1.10 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 553 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 400 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-65 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $2,000 | $626 |