Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Revealed December 2010
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX10
- Replacement is Samsung NX20
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX11, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is very similar but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX11 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-M1 was manufactured 3 years later than the NX11 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-M1 scores against the NX11 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung NX11. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX11
| WG-M1 | NX11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | December 2010 | More recent by 46 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| NX11 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 115k | Sharper display (+499k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX11
| WG-M1 | NX11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX11 has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") having a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX11 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 versus the NX11.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and NX11 is 91 and 80 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and NX11.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX11 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX11 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 11.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 499g (1.10 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 553 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 400 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-65 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $2,000 | $626 |