Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 3 years after the TL320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung TL320. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-ZR400 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| TL320 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL320
| EX-ZR400 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the TL320.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The picture here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and TL320.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to show greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL320 |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $380 |