Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 3 years after the TL320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung TL320. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-ZR400 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| TL320 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL320
| EX-ZR400 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the TL320.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The picture here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and TL320.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to show greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL320 |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $380 |
