Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR400 was revealed at a similar time to the WB30F and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR400 scores versus the WB30F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR400 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WB30F | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR400 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 has physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the WB30F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WB30F is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and WB30F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Portrait photography with Samsung WB30F
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
resolution is good (16MP)
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Street photography with Samsung WB30F
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (128 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography information
Samsung WB30F Sports photography information
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
max frames per second high (30.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
better than average battery power (500 shots)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Travel photography highlights
better than average battery power (500 shots)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others in class (128 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB30F Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (500 shots)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR400
Vlogging with Samsung WB30F
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (205g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no mic port
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
lighter than others in class (128 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone port
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $0 | $180 |