Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB35F
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was revealed 11 months prior to the WB35F which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR400 grades versus the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-ZR400 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WB35F | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-ZR400 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and WB35F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures although you should always consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography information
Samsung WB35F Street photography information
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB35F Sports photography highlights
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high max frames per second (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking focus
great battery pack (500 per charge)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
great battery pack (500 per charge)
lighter than competition (205g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR400
Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
missing mic support
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $130 |
