Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB700
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung WB700, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR400 was launched 2 years later than the WB700 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the WB700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB700
EX-ZR400 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | December 2010 | More recent by 26 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-ZR400
WB700 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | 461k | Crisper display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB700
EX-ZR400 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung WB700 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the WB700.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WB700 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The visual here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and WB700.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB700 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $300 |