Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB850F
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB850F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR400 was launched 13 months after the WB850F which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the WB850F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB850F
| EX-ZR400 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WB850F | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB850F
| EX-ZR400 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB850F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the WB850F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and WB850F is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at specs. The pic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and WB850F.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photos though you will want to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern EX-ZR400 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Portrait photography with Samsung WB850F
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography features
Samsung WB850F Street photography features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (250 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB850F as a Sports photography camera
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (30.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
better than average battery pack (500 per charge)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB850F Travel photography highlights
better than average battery pack (500 CIPA)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than average (250g)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography information
Samsung WB850F Landscape photography information
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
focusing manually
relatively wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging features
Samsung WB850F Vlogging features
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of mic socket
relatively wide (23mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (250g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB850F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $599 |
