Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD9
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Renewed by Sigma SD10

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

The EX-ZR400 was launched 10 years after the SD9 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR400 grades versus the SD9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Sigma SD9. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Sigma SD9
EX-ZR400 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2002 | Newer by 124 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 130k | Crisper screen (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-ZR400
SD9 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD9
EX-ZR400 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the SD9.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and SD9 is 92 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and SD9.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR400 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR400 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $0 | $3,001 |