Clicky

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
53
Overall
45
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front
 
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
Portability
54
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed January 2013
FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm S200EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and S200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") use totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZR700 was announced 3 years later than the S200EXR and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the S200EXR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 EX-ZR700 S200EXR 
IntroducedJanuary 2013July 2009Fresher by 43 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR700

 S200EXR EX-ZR700 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm S200EXR

 EX-ZR700 S200EXR 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).

See the Casio EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm S200EXR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the S200EXR.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and S200EXR is 91 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and S200EXR.

To sum up, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR700 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Casio EX-ZR700 will deliver extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
FujiFilm S200EXR as a Portrait photography camera
44
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
supports face detect focus
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
45
focusing manually
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.6")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Street photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (222g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
45
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/1.6")
heavier than competitors in class (865g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography info
FujiFilm S200EXR Sports photography info
51
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
34
great zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.6")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography information
FujiFilm S200EXR Travel photography information
71
better than average battery power (470 shots)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
missing Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
38
flash built-in
very long zoom (436mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (865 grams)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Landscape photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
52
focusing manually
decently wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
better than average battery power (470 shots)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
34
focusing manually
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.6")
lack of Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR700
Vlogging with FujiFilm S200EXR
34
decently wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (222g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
missing mic support
19
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (865 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm S200EXR
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR700FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR
General Information
Company Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR
Also referred to as - FinePix S205EXR
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-01-29 2009-07-22
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 EXR
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.6"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 8 x 6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 48.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO - 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 31-436mm (14.1x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.8-5.3
Macro focus distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 922 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 7.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 222g (0.49 pounds) 865g (1.91 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 NP-140
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC Internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $370 $500