Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm S200EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and S200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") use totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR700 was announced 3 years later than the S200EXR and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the S200EXR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
EX-ZR700 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 43 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR700
S200EXR | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm S200EXR
EX-ZR700 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm S200EXR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the S200EXR.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and S200EXR is 91 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and S200EXR.
To sum up, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR700 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Casio EX-ZR700 will deliver extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
Also referred to as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | EXR |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 865g (1.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | NP-140 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $370 | $500 |