Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
FujiFilm S4000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix S4050
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the S4000 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 2 years later than the S4000 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S4000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the S4000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm FinePix S4000. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and FujiFilm S4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the FujiFilm S4000
| EX-ZR700 | S4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S4000 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| S4000 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and FujiFilm S4000
| EX-ZR700 | S4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the FujiFilm S4000 has dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the S4000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and S4000 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The visual below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and S4000.
All in all, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to offer you greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography details
FujiFilm S4000 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Street photography with FujiFilm S4000
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (222g)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than average in class (540g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography highlights
FujiFilm S4000 Sports photography highlights
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery (470 per charge)
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography details
FujiFilm S4000 Travel photography details
better than average battery (470 shots)
lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (720mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (540g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography features
FujiFilm S4000 Landscape photography features
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
better than average battery (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging advice
FujiFilm S4000 Vlogging advice
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone port
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than average in class (540 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR700 vs FujiFilm S4000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 |
| Also called as | - | FinePix S4050 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 540 grams (1.19 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 300 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $370 | $279 |