Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C135
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C135 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-ZR700 and Kodak C135, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the C135 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was revealed 13 months after the C135 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the C135 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Kodak EasyShare C135. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Kodak C135
| EX-ZR700 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 13 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| C135 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Kodak C135
| EX-ZR700 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Kodak C135 has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR700 and Kodak C135 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR700 compared to the C135.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and C135 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out specs. The pic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and C135.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR700 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 112k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 175 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $370 | $0 |