Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z950
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Introduced June 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Kodak Z950, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and Z950 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 2 years after the Z950 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR700 scores vs the Z950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Kodak Z950
| EX-ZR700 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 32 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| Z950 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Kodak Z950
| EX-ZR700 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has sizing of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Kodak Z950 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the Z950.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and Z950 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The image here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and Z950.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 243 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $370 | $250 |