Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S32
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
35 Features
23 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S32 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S32 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Nikon S32, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Nikon. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and S32 (13MP) and the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and S32 (1/3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was announced 12 months before the S32 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR700 scores against the S32 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S32 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Nikon Coolpix S32. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Nikon S32 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Nikon S32
| EX-ZR700 | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| S32 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon S32
| EX-ZR700 | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S32 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Nikon S32 has measurements of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Nikon S32 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the S32.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and S32 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S32 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The picture underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and S32.
All in all, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR700 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-ZR700 will offer you greater detail with its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR700 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S32 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S32 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S32 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S32 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2014-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 30-90mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 175g (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 220 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $370 | $180 |