Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
96 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 120g - 90 x 53 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and S620 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR700 was released 4 years later than the S620 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the S620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Nikon Coolpix S620. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Nikon S620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Nikon S620
| EX-ZR700 | S620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 49 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S620 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| S620 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon S620
| EX-ZR700 | S620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Nikon S620 has sizing of 90mm x 53mm x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the S620.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and S620 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The photograph here might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and S620.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR700 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S620 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.7-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 120 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 90 x 53 x 23mm (3.5" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $370 | $37 |
