Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9900
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9700

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Nikon S9900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR700 was brought out 24 months before the S9900 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the S9900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Nikon Coolpix S9900. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Nikon S9900
EX-ZR700 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Casio EX-ZR700
S9900 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 24 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon S9900
EX-ZR700 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Nikon S9900 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Nikon S9900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the S9900.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and S9900 is 91 and 88 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and S9900.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of photographs however you should really consider the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR700 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $370 | $300 |