Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5020
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus FE-5020, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR700 was brought out 3 years after the FE-5020 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the FE-5020 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus FE-5020. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus FE-5020
EX-ZR700 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | July 2009 | Newer by 43 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-ZR700
FE-5020 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus FE-5020
EX-ZR700 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5020 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus FE-5020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the FE-5020.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and FE-5020 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and FE-5020.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to give you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus FE-5020 |
Also Known as | - | X-935 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 137g (0.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $370 | $160 |