Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus SZ-12
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Announced January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the SZ-12 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was launched 13 months later than the SZ-12 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the SZ-12 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus SZ-12. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus SZ-12
| EX-ZR700 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| SZ-12 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus SZ-12
| EX-ZR700 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-12 has dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the SZ-12.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and SZ-12 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The visual underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and SZ-12.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR700 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography information
Olympus SZ-12 Portrait photography information
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
good megapixels (14MP)
supports face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Street photography camera
Olympus SZ-12 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (226g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography features
Olympus SZ-12 Sports photography features
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
great battery power (470 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography information
Olympus SZ-12 Travel photography information
great battery power (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (220 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography info
Olympus SZ-12 Landscape photography info
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
great battery power (470 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
relatively wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
not so great battery pack (220 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging details
Olympus SZ-12 Vlogging details
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone jack
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus SZ-12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus SZ-12 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 220 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $370 | $350 |