Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c919/1c9190b66ae9d20e63ea1a028964e79ad2a5586f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus 8000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The EX-ZR700 was manufactured 3 years later than the 8000 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the 8000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus 8000
EX-ZR700 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 44 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Casio EX-ZR700
8000 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus 8000
EX-ZR700 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus 8000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03184/03184643b423836ed3e84efe25f4db69da1a009c" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and 8000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b70b/8b70bc06454e60fcc7332a60c135be6e4705bf1f" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and 8000.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR700 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb780/fb78031fc3b14b06b2a1a3b94c09721fe54f1ab8" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5154/d515445f1649a4e0d66a059e9932ec352db9f2ff" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 182g (0.40 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $370 | $380 |