Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus TG-830 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was unveiled within a month of the TG-830 iHS and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| EX-ZR700 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR700
| TG-830 iHS | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| EX-ZR700 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 has outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has proportions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the TG-830 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and TG-830 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The image here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP and you should expect similar quality of files although you need to factor the production date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
MP count decent (16MP)
offers face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography info
Olympus TG-830 iHS Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (222g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-830 iHS Sports photography highlights
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking focus
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-830 iHS Travel photography information
better than average battery power (470 shots)
lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
environment proofing
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-830 iHS Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
really wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-830 iHS Vlogging information
relatively wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (222g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
missing mic port
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 300 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $370 | $0 |