Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR700 was brought out 2 years after the CX3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR700 matches up versus the CX3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-ZR700 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 32 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| CX3 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-ZR700 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the CX3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and CX3 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and CX3.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to produce more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR700 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $370 | $329 |