Clicky

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2013
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Released February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZR700 was launched 13 months later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR700 scores against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

          

          

            
 EX-ZR700 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2012More recent by 13 months
Screen resolution922k920kClearer screen (+2k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-ZR700

          

          

            
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 EX-ZR700 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

          

          

            
 EX-ZR700 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Focus manually  More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch screen  Absent Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 91 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Normally, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR700 uses the smaller sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging. The more recent EX-ZR700 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

            Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Portrait photography camera
43
 has manual focus
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 features face detection focus
 external flash not possible
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
73
 has manual focus
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 features face detect focusing
 delivers RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR700 as a Street photography camera
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Street photography camera
61
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average (222g)
 fixed screen
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
55
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 delivers RAW files
 no articulating screen
 lack of image stabilization
 heavier than competition (550g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography details
50
 great zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (16MP)
 features tracking autofocus
 good battery life (470 per charge)
 max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
48
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
 lack of image stabilization
 doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
70
 good battery life (470 per charge)
 lighter than average (222 grams)
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 relatively wide (25mm)
 long zoom (450mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse function
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
58
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 has built in flash
 pretty wide (24mm)
 heavier than competition (550g)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography details
51
 has manual focus
 relatively wide (25mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (16 megapixels)
 good battery life (470 shots)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 doesn't have Timelapse function
62
 has manual focus
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 delivers RAW files
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR700
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
34
 relatively wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detection focus
 high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than average (222 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 doesn't have external microphone support
24
 pretty wide (24mm)
 features face detect focusing
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 no mic socket
 heavier than competition (550 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR700Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2013-01-29 2012-02-02
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 922k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 222g (0.49 lb) 550g (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photos 400 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting    
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $370 $871