Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR700 was announced 19 months after the WB210 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the WB210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB210
EX-ZR700 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2011 | More modern by 19 months | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 1k | Clearer screen (+921k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-ZR700
WB210 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB210
EX-ZR700 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the WB210.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and WB210.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to provide greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR700 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB210 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 1k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 174 grams (0.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $370 | $279 |