Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- New Model is Sigma SD10
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-ZR700 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR700 was unveiled 10 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR700 scores vs the SD9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Sigma SD9. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Sigma SD9
EX-ZR700 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | November 2002 | More recent by 124 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 130k | Crisper screen (+792k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-ZR700
SD9 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Sigma SD9
EX-ZR700 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the SD9.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and SD9 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and SD9.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR700 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR700 will give extra detail having an extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR700 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $370 | $3,001 |