Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") possess different sensor sizing.

The EX-ZR800 was manufactured 4 years later than the Fujifilm F200EXR and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the Fujifilm F200EXR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 52 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR800
Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F200EXR has dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 91 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The visual below should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR800 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-ZR800 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2009-04-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $429 | $350 |