Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD

Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD front
Portability
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed August 2013
Fujifilm S2000HD
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
  • Launched January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Overview

Following is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Fujifilm S2000HD, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-ZR800 was manufactured 4 years after the Fujifilm S2000HD which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the Fujifilm S2000HD in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Fujifilm S2000HD

					

					

						
 EX-ZR800 Fujifilm S2000HD 
LaunchedAugust 2013January 2009More modern by 56 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution922k230kSharper display (+692k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Casio EX-ZR800

					

					

						
 Fujifilm S2000HD EX-ZR800 
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S2000HD

					

					

						
 EX-ZR800 Fujifilm S2000HD 
Manually focus  More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display  Neither provides Touch display
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Physical Comparison

					

					

						
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Fujifilm S2000HD has sizing of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Fujifilm S2000HD in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the Fujifilm S2000HD.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S2000HD is 91 and 75 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
Quite often, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specifications. The pic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S2000HD.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to show greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

						Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography highlights
Fujifilm S2000HD Portrait photography highlights
44
 focusing manually
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 offers face detection focus
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
27
 has manual focus
 no external flash support
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Street Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Street photography with Fujifilm S2000HD
61
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
38
 no articulating screen
 lack of image stabilization
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Sports photography with Fujifilm S2000HD
51
 excellent zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking autofocus
 better than average battery life (470 per charge)
 very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
23
 excellent zoom range (28-414mm  14.8 x zoom)
 max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
 painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
 lack of image stabilization
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography factors
Fujifilm S2000HD Travel photography factors
74
 better than average battery life (470 per charge)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 pretty wide (25mm)
 great zoom (450mm)
 does not contain selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
53
 flash built-in
 pretty wide (28mm)
 very long reach (414mm)
 lack of Timelapse function
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography features
Fujifilm S2000HD Landscape photography features
55
 focusing manually
 pretty wide (25mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 better than average battery life (470 per charge)
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
30
 has manual focus
 pretty wide (28mm)
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
 lack of image stabilization
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Vlogging camera
 Fujifilm S2000HD as a Vlogging camera
34
 pretty wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detection focus
 high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 does not contain selfie friendly screen
 missing external microphone jack
21
 pretty wide (28mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 lack of external microphone socket
Photography Glossary
				
								
				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Fujifilm S2000HD
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD
General Information
Brand Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-08-07 2009-01-15
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-450mm (18.0x) 28-414mm (14.8x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.5-5.4
Macro focusing distance 4cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 922k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 8.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 222 grams (0.49 pounds) 426 grams (0.94 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $429 $280