Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replaced the Nikon S9500
- Newer Model is Nikon S9900
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the S9700 (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR800 was released 6 months before the S9700 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the S9700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Nikon Coolpix S9700. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Nikon S9700
EX-ZR800 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 921k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Casio EX-ZR800
S9700 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Nikon S9700
EX-ZR800 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | February 2014 | Similar generation | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Nikon S9700 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the S9700.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and S9700 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and S9700.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of photographs though you will need to consider the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2014-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 232g (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 300 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $429 | $350 |