Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Launched January 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus SP-620 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the SP-620 UZ (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was manufactured 20 months after the SP-620 UZ making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the SP-620 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus SP-620 UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
EX-ZR800 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 20 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Casio EX-ZR800
SP-620 UZ | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
EX-ZR800 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 features outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus SP-620 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Olympus SP-620 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the SP-620 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6da6/e6da63299bfcce913296bb60214a391cd5f19d97" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and SP-620 UZ is 91 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3b3b/c3b3b74734d8bb3ac5bdf17b296158e8057471d4" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and SP-620 UZ.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photos however you might want to take the age of the cameras into account. The younger EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4d2e/a4d2e20a587b4d804ef228bb6cd459a411841cd2" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a27e3/a27e36ef24cfe0556f3a7edbaad96eb19d947835" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 435g (0.96 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $429 | $199 |