Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Also Known as EVOLT E-330
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-330 and Olympus FE-4000, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FE-4000 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-330 was launched 4 years prior to the FE-4000 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-330 scores against the FE-4000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 and Olympus FE-4000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus FE-4000
E-330 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-330
FE-4000 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | March 2006 | More recent by 40 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus FE-4000
E-330 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 offers exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 and Olympus FE-4000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-330 vs the FE-4000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8194/a81949015dae26cc7303d43218ad578f72c5ff7e" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and FE-4000 is 65 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95d95/95d95c037608dec1874261f6fbcf1be688cba77a" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and FE-4000.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-330 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus FE-4000 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46be2/46be2ea0ecf6e52ef62a7891493076037dddfd36" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51c84/51c84b74ae55eb713be747ff6676e832167d13fe" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus FE-4000 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | X-925 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lbs) | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $1,100 | $130 |