Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released August 2013
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Below is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-ZR800 was introduced 20 months later than the TG-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-320

					

					

						
 EX-ZR800 TG-320 
LaunchedAugust 2013January 2012More recent by 20 months
Manually focus  Very accurate focus
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kSharper screen (+692k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-ZR800

					

					

						
 TG-320 EX-ZR800 
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-320

					

					

						
 EX-ZR800 TG-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither contains Touch screen
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

					

					

						
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the TG-320.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and TG-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and TG-320.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR800 will have a benefit in sensor technology.

						Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
44
 focusing manually
 MP count decent (16 megapixels)
 comes with face detect focusing
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
33
 good MP (14 megapixels)
 provides face detection autofocus
 manual focus not available
 manual exposure not possible
 can't use external flash
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Street photography factors
61
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (222 grams)
 no articulating screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
66
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
 screen is fixed
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
51
 amazing zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count decent (16MP)
 comes with tracking focus
 better than average battery power (470 per charge)
 painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect AF
40
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (14 megapixels)
 provides tracking autofocus
 weather proof
 low frames per second (1.0 fps)
 no shutter priority
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 low battery life (150 CIPA)
 does not have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography info
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography info
74
 better than average battery power (470 per charge)
 lighter than competitors (222g)
 MP count decent (16MP)
 flash built-in
 really wide (25mm)
 long zoom (450mm)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
67
 lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
 weather proof
 good MP (14MP)
 flash built-in
 relatively wide (28mm)
 no Time Lapse recording
 low battery life (150 shots)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
55
 focusing manually
 really wide (25mm)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count decent (16 megapixels)
 better than average battery power (470 per charge)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
39
 relatively wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good MP (14 megapixels)
 weather proof
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
 manual exposure not possible
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW files
 low battery life (150 shots)
 no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging advice
34
 really wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detect focusing
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competitors (222 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 doesn't have microphone port
32
 relatively wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detection autofocus
 lighter than competitors in class (155g)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 does not feature selfie friendly display
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 no external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
				
								
				

					

						
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-320
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Olympus TG-320
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Olympus TG-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2013-08-07 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance 4cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 922k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 222g (0.49 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photos 150 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $429 $0