Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Olympus TG-630 iHS front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced August 2013
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR800 was brought out 8 months later than the TG-630 iHS and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the TG-630 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS

 EX-ZR800 TG-630 iHS 
LaunchedAugust 2013January 2013More recent by 8 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen resolution922k460kCrisper screen (+462k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR800

 TG-630 iHS EX-ZR800 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-630 iHS

 EX-ZR800 TG-630 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 features outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the TG-630 iHS.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and TG-630 iHS is 91 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The photograph below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and TG-630 iHS.

Plainly, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to give you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-630 iHS Portrait photography factors
44
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
27
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography factors
Olympus TG-630 iHS Street photography factors
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-630 iHS Sports photography factors
51
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes tracking focus
good battery life (470 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max fps very slow (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-630 iHS Travel photography factors
74
good battery life (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
59
environment sealing
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (220 CIPA)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
55
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good battery life (470 shots)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
39
quite wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
missing Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-630 iHS Vlogging information
34
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
33
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly display
missing external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Olympus TG-630 iHS
General Information
Brand Name Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Olympus TG-630 iHS
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Introduced 2013-08-07 2013-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range 4cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 922k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 222g (0.49 lb) 167g (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photographs 220 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $429 $200