Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR800 was launched 2 years after the TG-810 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the TG-810 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-810. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-810
| EX-ZR800 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 | August 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| TG-810 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-810
| EX-ZR800 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the TG-810.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and TG-810 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The picture below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and TG-810.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $429 | $428 |