Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR800 was revealed 7 months before the TG-3 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the TG-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus TG-3
EX-ZR800 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Casio EX-ZR800
TG-3 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | August 2013 | Fresher by 7 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus TG-3
EX-ZR800 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 features external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the TG-3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and TG-3 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR800 and TG-3.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you will want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR800 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $429 | $350 |