Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ10W
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced May 2009
- Other Name is WB500

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung HZ10W, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR800 was launched 4 years later than the HZ10W and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the HZ10W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung HZ10W. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung HZ10W
EX-ZR800 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 52 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Casio EX-ZR800
HZ10W | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung HZ10W
EX-ZR800 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Samsung HZ10W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the HZ10W.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and HZ10W is 91 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the gap between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and HZ10W.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung HZ10W |
Also called as | - | WB500 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2432 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 249 gr (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $429 | $300 |