Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 8 months later than the WB250F and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR800 grades against the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR800 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 8 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB250F | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR800 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 comes with physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the WB250F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and WB250F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The photograph below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and WB250F.
All in all, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
resolution is good (14MP)
provides face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (226g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography info
Samsung WB250F Sports photography info
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
great battery pack (470 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography details
Samsung WB250F Travel photography details
great battery pack (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition (222g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition (226 grams)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (432mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography features
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (470 shots)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB250F Vlogging advice
quite wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
missing external microphone socket
relatively wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (226g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $429 | $250 |
