Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR800 was introduced 20 months later than the WB850F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the WB850F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung WB850F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung WB850F
| EX-ZR800 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 20 months |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WB850F | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung WB850F
| EX-ZR800 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the WB850F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WB850F is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WB850F.
All in all, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you will need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR800 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB850F Portrait photography features
manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
has face detect focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB850F as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (222g)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (250 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography information
Samsung WB850F Sports photography information
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
good battery pack (470 per charge)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
has tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography information
Samsung WB850F Travel photography information
good battery pack (470 CIPA)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long zoom (450mm)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competitors (250 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
no Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB850F Landscape photography info
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good battery pack (470 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
manual focus
really wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB850F Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
missing external mic socket
really wide (23mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (250 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung WB850F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $429 | $599 |