Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony NEX-5R
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Replacement is Sony NEX-5T

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Sony NEX-5R, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the NEX-5R (16MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.

The EX-ZR800 was revealed 12 months later than the NEX-5R which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR800 grades vs the NEX-5R in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony NEX-5R
EX-ZR800 | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Casio EX-ZR800
NEX-5R | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony NEX-5R
EX-ZR800 | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 enjoys outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5R has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Sony NEX-5R in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the NEX-5R.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and NEX-5R is 91 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and NEX-5R.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-ZR800 has the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF tougher. The more recent EX-ZR800 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 4cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $429 | $750 |