Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony T900 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR800 was launched 4 years after the T900 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony T900
| EX-ZR800 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| T900 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony T900
| EX-ZR800 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 922k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 has exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the T900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The picture here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and T900.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR800 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $429 | $300 |