Clicky

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000

Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 front
 
Olympus FE-4000 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZS10
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2011
Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Alternate Name is X-925
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZS10 was introduced 18 months after the FE-4000 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZS10 grades vs the FE-4000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Olympus FE-4000

 EX-ZS10 FE-4000 
LaunchedJanuary 2011July 2009More modern by 18 months

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Casio EX-ZS10

 FE-4000 EX-ZS10 
Display size2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Olympus FE-4000

 EX-ZS10 FE-4000 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZS10 has physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4000 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZS10 versus the FE-4000.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZS10 and FE-4000 is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The picture here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and FE-4000.

As you have seen, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZS10 to produce more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZS10 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus FE-4000 as a Portrait photography camera
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
21
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Street photography features
Olympus FE-4000 Street photography features
49
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low maximum ISO (0)
55
lighter than competitors (136g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Sports photography advice
Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography advice
32
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus FE-4000 as a Travel photography camera
71
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
62
lighter than competitors (136 grams)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Landscape photography information
Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography information
33
very good max aperture (f)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
screen is somewhat small ( inches)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
28
pretty wide (26mm)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZS10 Vlogging information
Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging information
27
very good max aperture (f)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic port
28
pretty wide (26mm)
lighter than competitors (136 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZS10 and Olympus FE-4000
 Casio Exilim EX-ZS10Olympus FE-4000
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 Olympus FE-4000
Alternate name - X-925
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-01-05 2009-07-22
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO - 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.6-5.9
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal - 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 0 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed - 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.00 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 136g (0.30 lb)
Physical dimensions 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer - Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Storage media - xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $120 $130