Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-ZS10 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZS10 was launched 15 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-ZS10 matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-ZS10 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | November 2009 | Newer by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-ZS10
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-ZS10 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZS10 comes with outer measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZS10 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 99 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZS10 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZS10 because of its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Casio EX-ZS10 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZS10 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | - | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | - | 3" |
Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $120 | $566 |