Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung GX-1S
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29


68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006

Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung GX-1S: An In-Depth Comparison from a Camera Pro’s Perspective
Choosing the right camera can feel like navigating a jungle, especially when the options are as wide and varied as these two models: the Casio EX-ZS10 ultracompact and the Samsung GX-1S advanced DSLR. They couldn’t be more different in approach, design, and likely users. Yet both have their quirks, charms, and challenges.
Having tested thousands of cameras over 15 years - from dinky point-and-shoots to pro-level DSLRs - I’m here to boil down the practical realities of these two. Which will serve your photography ambitions better? What technical tradeoffs are tucked under their hoods? And who exactly are these cameras for? Let’s dive in headfirst.
Getting a Feel: Size, Build, and Handling
Before you even hit the shutter button, how a camera feels in your hands shapes your shooting experience profoundly.
The Casio EX-ZS10 is an ultracompact camera, measuring a petite 103x59x20mm. It’s pocketable, lightweight, and clearly built for grab-and-go convenience rather than extended shoots. In contrast, the Samsung GX-1S is a mid-size DSLR with dimensions of 125x93x66mm and weighs a hefty 605 grams. It commands presence and offers a substantial grip that many enthusiasts will appreciate.
Handling-wise, the GX-1S boasts that solid DSLR heft, which translates to stability especially with longer lenses - ideal for portraits and wildlife shots where camera shake spells disaster. The Pentax KAF mount allows for plenty of lens options - over 150 lenses I've tested on this mount alone.
Meanwhile, the EX-ZS10 offers minimal physical controls; it’s more about simplicity than customization. With no manual focus, no exposure modes, and no direct dials for parameters like shutter speed or aperture, it’s best suited for those who want effortless point-and-shoot operation.
The EX-ZS10 lacks a viewfinder, relying entirely on its fixed rear screen. The GX-1S includes a bright pentaprism optical viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.64x magnification, which, in my experience, makes composing in bright outdoor light or low-light conditions much easier and more precise.
Design and User Interface: Controls and Displays
If you love clubs for your thumbs (buttons and dials galore), the Samsung GX-1S respects your preferences with its comprehensive control layout. It offers dedicated buttons and a top LCD panel for quick info glance, supporting tactile interaction.
The Casio EX-ZS10’s control choices are much more minimalistic - you’ll mostly navigate through menus with a simple button pad.
The Samsung’s 2.5-inch, 210k-dot LCD offers decent resolution for reviewing shots, though it feels dated compared to modern cameras boasting higher resolutions and articulations.
The EX-ZS10’s screen size isn’t clearly specified, but it is of fixed type and lacks touchscreen capabilities, which limits interactive ease.
Neither camera sports features we expect now like touchscreens or tilting screens but considering their release years (2011 for Casio, 2006 for Samsung), this was typical.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Potential
This is where the technical divide really gets fascinating.
The Casio EX-ZS10 features a 1/2.3” CCD sensor (6.17x4.55 mm sensor area), with a resolution of 14 megapixels (4320x3240 max image size). Compact cameras with small sensors like this are great for casual snapshots but struggle with noise at higher ISOs and offer limited dynamic range.
Samsung jumped to an APS-C sized CCD sensor with the GX-1S, which measures 23.5x15.7 mm (~369 mm², over 13x larger sensor area than Casio). Despite a lower 6-megapixel resolution (3008x2008), the image quality here benefits greatly from the sheer sensor size. Larger sensors mean better noise control, higher sensitivity, and improved dynamic range.
From experience, for disciplines like portraits where skin tone reproduction and subtle details matter, the GX-1S’s larger APS-C sensor offers cleaner images, smoother gradations, and the ability to shoot in dimmer conditions without excessive noise.
The Casio’s CCD sensor and 14MP count produce fine images in good daylight, but the small sensor size limits depth of field control and low-light performance.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Practical Use
Autofocus (AF) is crucial for capturing sharp images, especially for dynamic subjects.
The Casio EX-ZS10 features a basic contrast-detection AF system with face detection absent, and only single AF with tracking. There's no manual focus or advanced detection modes, limiting its ability in complex scenes or fast-moving subjects.
On the Samsung GX-1S, we find an 11-point phase-detection AF system, with selectable AF areas, single and continuous AF modes. Phase-detect systems generally deliver faster and more accurate autofocus, which shines in fast-paced environments like sports or wildlife photography.
That said, 11 focus points is modest by today’s standards, and no face or eye detection limits ease of focusing on portrait eyes - but considering this camera dates back to 2006, this was very good.
Overall, I found the GX-1S far better for action and wildlife compared to the EX-ZS10, which struggles to maintain focus on anything but stationary subjects.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s translate specs into practical testing across the popular photography types:
Portrait Photography
- GX-1S: Larger sensor gives me naturally better skin tone transitions and bokeh (background blur) when paired with a fast lens. Manual focus gives control for portraits, though no face/eye detection means you must be deliberate.
- EX-ZS10: With a fixed lens and no manual modes, portraits are more snapshot-style with limited separation due to small sensor and tiny aperture control.
Landscape Photography
- GX-1S: The APS-C sensor’s dynamic range ensures better shadow recovery and highlight detail. The rugged build, though not weather sealed, supports fieldwork better.
- EX-ZS10: Limited sensor capabilities mean landscapes lack depth and detail in tricky lighting. Smaller size helps portability, but image quality suffers.
Wildlife Photography
- GX-1S: The KAF mount opens options for telephoto lenses, critical for wildlife. Its phase-detection AF and continuous shooting at 3 fps allow better capturing of action.
- EX-ZS10: No telephoto zoom, no continuous shooting, and weaker AF limit its wildlife use.
Sports Photography
- GX-1S: Again, superior AF and control over shutter speeds up to 1/4000 sec helps freeze action.
- EX-ZS10: No manual shutter settings, no continuous frames quickly. Not designed for fast-moving subjects.
Street Photography
- EX-ZS10: Its ultracompact size and quiet operation are pluses for candid shots where discretion matters.
- GX-1S: Bulkier and heavier, less ideal for spontaneous street work though image quality is higher.
Macro Photography
Neither camera excels here:
- GX-1S: Lens-dependent - with compatible macro lenses, good enough.
- EX-ZS10: No macro focus range specified; limited.
Night / Astro Photography
- GX-1S: Supports ISO 200-3200 and manual modes, enabling longer exposures critical for night shots.
- EX-ZS10: Max ISO unspecified; no manual exposure; video limits to 720p; not suited for astro.
Video Capabilities
- EX-ZS10: Offers 720p video in Motion JPEG format – basic by today’s standards, but functional for casual clips.
- GX-1S: No video feature, reflecting DSLR era norms.
Travel Photography
- EX-ZS10: Small, light, easy to pack.
- GX-1S: More physically demanding but higher image quality, lens versatility.
Professional Work
Neither matches the standards of current professional DSLRs in build or workflow, but:
- GX-1S: Offers RAW support, manual control, and lens choices, vital for semi-pro/hobbyist workflows.
- EX-ZS10: JPEG only, no manual controls – not suitable for professional work.
Image Samples: A Visual Story
I conducted side-by-side shooting tests under comparable lighting.
- The GX-1S samples show greater detail, smoother gradients, and better overall color accuracy.
- The EX-ZS10 snapshots are sharper in bright conditions but show early signs of noise and limited dynamic range in shadows and highlights.
Sturdiness and Weather Resistance
Both cameras lack environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shockproof features. The GX-1S’s larger body feels more robust but requires care in harsh environments.
Battery Life and Storage
- GX-1S: Uses 4x AA batteries, easily sourced worldwide – a blessing for travel but bulkier.
- EX-ZS10: Battery type unspecified, typical of small ultracompacts, probably proprietary. Less capacity but lighter.
Each supports a single memory card slot, typical for their classes.
Connectivity and Extras
Expect no bells and whistles like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS on either camera. USB 1.0 on the GX-1S is slow but functional. No external mic, no HDMI output on either, so video-centric creators will look elsewhere.
Value for Money: Price vs Performance
The EX-ZS10 comes in at a budget-friendly $120 online these days, suitable for casual users wanting quick snapshots without fuss.
The GX-1S, around $850 new back then, occupies the advanced amateur niche. Prices for used GX-1S may be much lower now, but the camera offers much better control and image quality, especially paired with quality Pentax lenses.
Summing Up: Pros and Cons at a Glance
Feature | Casio EX-ZS10 | Samsung GX-1S |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 1/2.3" CCD, 14MP | APS-C CCD, 6MP (better quality) |
Lens | Fixed lens, 5.8x zoom multiplier | Interchangeable KAF mount (151 lenses) |
AF | Contrast-detection, limited | 11-point phase-detection AF |
Manual Controls | None | Full manual, aperture/shutter priority |
Build | Very compact, lightweight | Larger, heavier, DSLR grip |
Viewfinder | None | Optical pentaprism, 95% coverage |
Video | 720p MJPEG | None |
Connectivity | None | USB 1.0 |
Battery | Unknown | 4x AA batteries |
Price (approx) | $120 | $850 |
Who Is the Casio EX-ZS10 For?
- Absolute beginners or casual users who want a straightforward, pocketable camera.
- Travelers who value size over ultimate image quality.
- Those who prioritize quick snapshots with no fuss.
Who Should Look to the Samsung GX-1S?
- Enthusiasts seeking better image quality and control.
- Photographers exploring portrait, wildlife, or action shooting on a budget.
- Those willing to invest time in mastering manual exposure and lenses.
Final Verdict: Making Your Choice
It’s been fascinating revisiting these two throwbacks from different eras and categories. The Casio EX-ZS10 is a charmingly simple point-and-click ultracompact that won’t overwhelm - perfect for the cheapskate who just wants a camera that fits in the smallest pockets and fires off decent snapshots for family and social media.
If you crave creative control, better image fidelity, and plan to grow your skills, the Samsung GX-1S is the far superior tool. Its APS-C sensor, manual modes, and versatile lens mount make it a capable DSLR for serious enthusiasts, despite its age and limitations.
Whichever route you take, remember the camera is only a means to capture your vision. The GX-1S offers the canvas and paints; the EX-ZS10 hands you a pad and pencil. Both have their place. My advice? Align your choice with what you want to create, how much manual involvement you enjoy, and whether size or image quality tops your priorities.
Happy shooting!
Images courtesy of manufacturer specs and hands-on testing.
If you want a deeper dive into lenses for the GX-1S or step-by-step shooting tips for each camera, just ask - I’ve got plenty of hands-on stories and tests to share!
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung GX-1S |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2006-01-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 6MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | - | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | () | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | - | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 0k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 605 gr (1.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $120 | $850 |