Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released December 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZS10 (14MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is pretty close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZS10 was announced very close to the WB700 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZS10 scores vs the WB700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB700. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZS10 Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS10 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-ZS10 | WB700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-ZS10
| WB700 | EX-ZS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 0k | Crisper screen (+614k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS10 and Samsung WB700
| EX-ZS10 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 | December 2010 | Same generation | |
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZS10 has physical measurements of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZS10 vs the WB700.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZS10 and WB700 is 99 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZS10 and WB700.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs but you need to take the production date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZS10 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZS10 | Samsung WB700 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | - |
| Lowest native ISO | - | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | () |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | - | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 0 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $120 | $300 |