Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M590
99 Imaging
37 Features
23 Overall
31
99 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M590 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 848 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 103 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 58 x 15mm
- Released August 2010
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M590 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZS5 versus Kodak M590, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZS5 (14MP) and the M590 (14MP) is very close but the EX-ZS5 (1/2.3") and M590 (1/3") use totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZS5 was manufactured 5 months later than the M590 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZS5 matches up versus the M590 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M590 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 & Kodak M590. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZS5 Gallery & Kodak M590 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZS5 over the Kodak M590
EX-ZS5 | M590 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M590 over the Casio EX-ZS5
M590 | EX-ZS5 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZS5 and Kodak M590
EX-ZS5 | M590 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | August 2010 | Same age | |
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M590 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZS5 offers outer dimensions of 103mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak M590 has proportions of 97mm x 58mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZS5 versus Kodak M590 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZS5 and the M590.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZS5 and M590 is 99 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M590 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specifications. The visual underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZS5 and M590.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer the same exact MP but not the same sensor measurements. The EX-ZS5 uses the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult.
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M590 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZS5 vs Kodak M590 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Kodak M590 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Kodak M590 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-08-23 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3242 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | () | () |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Dimensions | 103 x 59 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 97 x 58 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse recording | ||
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $100 | $120 |