Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix AV205
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the AV200 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe TRYX was introduced within a month of the AV200 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm AV200 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TRYX matches up vs the AV200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim TRYX & FujiFilm FinePix AV200. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery & FujiFilm AV200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the FujiFilm AV200
| TRYX | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Casio TRYX
| AV200 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm AV200
| TRYX | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX provides outer dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the FujiFilm AV200 has measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the TRYX and the AV200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TRYX and AV200 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and AV200.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the FujiFilm AV200 to give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 |
| Also called as | - | FinePix AV205 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.9-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 photos |
| Type of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $689 | $0 |
