Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV250
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV250 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix AV255
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV250 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio TRYX versus FujiFilm AV250, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and AV250 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TRYX was introduced at a similar time to the AV250 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm AV250 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TRYX matches up against the AV250 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV250 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim TRYX & FujiFilm FinePix AV250. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery & FujiFilm AV250 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the FujiFilm AV250
| TRYX | AV250 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV250 over the Casio TRYX
| AV250 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm AV250
| TRYX | AV250 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV250 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX has outer dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm AV250 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Casio TRYX versus FujiFilm AV250 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the TRYX compared to the AV250.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and AV250 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV250 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TRYX and AV250.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the FujiFilm AV250 to result in more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV250 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm AV250 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix AV250 |
| Also called as | - | FinePix AV255 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3440 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 images |
| Battery type | - | AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $689 | $160 |