Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T300
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T305
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T300 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio TRYX versus FujiFilm T300, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the T300 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TRYX was announced 6 months before the T300 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm T300 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the TRYX grades against the T300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX & FujiFilm FinePix T300. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery & FujiFilm T300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the FujiFilm T300
| TRYX | T300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T300 over the Casio TRYX
| T300 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and FujiFilm T300
| TRYX | T300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | July 2011 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T300 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio TRYX enjoys outside measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm T300 has sizing of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Casio TRYX versus FujiFilm T300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TRYX versus the T300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and T300 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and T300.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the FujiFilm T300 to give more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively.
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio TRYX vs FujiFilm T300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | FujiFilm FinePix T300 |
| Otherwise known as | - | FinePix T305 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.4-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.60 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 180 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $689 | $250 |