Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is very comparable but the TRYX (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") provide different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TRYX was unveiled 21 months later than the Fujifilm F200EXR making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the TRYX grades vs the Fujifilm F200EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim TRYX & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The full galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| TRYX | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | April 2009 | More recent by 21 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm F200EXR | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm F200EXR
| TRYX | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio TRYX has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has sizing of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the TRYX and the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and Fujifilm F200EXR is 99 and 93 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The photograph here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with the identical megapixels but different sensor measurements. The TRYX comes with the smaller sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field tougher. The fresher TRYX should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-04-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $689 | $350 |