Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8400W
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8400W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released March 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8400W Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Casio TRYX versus Fujifilm S8400W, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TRYX was introduced 3 years earlier than the Fujifilm S8400W which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TRYX scores against the Fujifilm S8400W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8400W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX and Fujifilm FinePix S8400W. The whole galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery and Fujifilm S8400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm S8400W
| TRYX | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm S8400W | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 26 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm S8400W
| TRYX | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8400W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX features outside measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8400W has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio TRYX versus Fujifilm S8400W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the TRYX and the Fujifilm S8400W.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and Fujifilm S8400W is 99 and 61 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8400W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TRYX and Fujifilm S8400W.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Fujifilm S8400W to offer you extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged TRYX is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8400W Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm S8400W Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2013-03-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 24-1056mm (44.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 670 grams (1.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Form of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $689 | $300 |