Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
34
Overall
34

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch Overview

Lets look much closer at the Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Touch (14MP) is fairly similar but the TRYX (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") posses different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The TRYX was brought out very close to the Touch so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TRYX matches up against the Touch with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Kodak Touch

 TRYX Touch 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution461k460kSharper display (+1k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio TRYX

 Touch TRYX 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Kodak Touch

 TRYX Touch 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2011Similar generation
Manual focus No manual focus
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Casio TRYX has exterior measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Kodak Touch has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check out the Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the TRYX against the Touch.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and Touch is 99 and 95 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and Touch.

As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TRYX featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Kodak Touch will offer you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively.

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX Portrait photography details
Kodak Touch Portrait photography details
21
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
32
resolution is good (14MP)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio TRYX Street photography factors
Kodak Touch Street photography factors
58
screen articulates
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (150 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio TRYX as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Touch as a Sports photography camera
17
focal length is fixed (21mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
27
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX Travel photography info
Kodak Touch Travel photography info
56
selfie friendly display
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12MP)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
67
resolution is good (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (150g)
display is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio TRYX Landscape photography factors
Kodak Touch Landscape photography factors
28
good sized screen (3")
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (21mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
41
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX Vlogging details
Kodak Touch Vlogging details
62
selfie friendly display
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
no external mic support
31
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen enabled
offers face detection autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition in class (150g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio TRYX vs Kodak Touch Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Kodak Touch
 Casio Exilim TRYXKodak EasyShare Touch
General Information
Brand Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim TRYX Kodak EasyShare Touch
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-01-05 2011-01-04
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21mm (1x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 -
Macro focusing range 8cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 7.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 461 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/8s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.20 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 150g (0.33 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $689 $100