Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-30
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Photography Glossary Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Casio TRYX and Ricoh WG-30, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TRYX was launched 4 years prior to the WG-30 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TRYX matches up vs the WG-30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX and Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Ricoh WG-30
| TRYX | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio TRYX
| WG-30 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 45 months |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Ricoh WG-30
| TRYX | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio TRYX features external dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio TRYX and Ricoh WG-30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the TRYX vs the WG-30.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and WG-30 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TRYX and WG-30.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged TRYX is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $689 | $428 |