Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-70
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Casio TRYX and Ricoh WG-70, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TRYX was brought out 10 years prior to the WG-70 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the TRYX grades versus the WG-70 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim TRYX & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio TRYX Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Ricoh WG-70
| TRYX | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio TRYX
| WG-70 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 110 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Ricoh WG-70
| TRYX | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX provides outer measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio TRYX and Ricoh WG-70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TRYX and the WG-70.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and WG-70 is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and WG-70.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to resolve more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older TRYX is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio TRYX vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $689 | $280 |