Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio TRYX versus Samsung WB250F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TRYX was manufactured 24 months prior to the WB250F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TRYX scores versus the WB250F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim TRYX & Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung WB250F
TRYX | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio TRYX
WB250F | TRYX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung WB250F
TRYX | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size |
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX offers physical measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Casio TRYX versus Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TRYX vs the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and WB250F is 99 and 93 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and WB250F.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB250F to deliver extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older TRYX is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim TRYX | Samsung WB250F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 8cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $689 | $250 |