Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Samsung WB250F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Launched January 2011
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Casio TRYX versus Samsung WB250F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The TRYX was manufactured 24 months prior to the WB250F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TRYX scores versus the WB250F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Samsung WB250F

 TRYX WB250F 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution461k460kClearer display (+1k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio TRYX

 WB250F TRYX 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2011Fresher by 24 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio TRYX and Samsung WB250F

 TRYX WB250F 
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio TRYX offers physical measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Contrast the Casio TRYX versus Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TRYX vs the WB250F.

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and WB250F is 99 and 93 respectively.

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and WB250F.

As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB250F to deliver extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older TRYX is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio TRYX Portrait photography details
Samsung WB250F Portrait photography details
21
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
36
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio TRYX Street photography features
Samsung WB250F Street photography features
58
screen can move to multiple angles
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (226 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio TRYX Sports photography info
Samsung WB250F Sports photography info
17
focal length is fixed (21mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
52
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio TRYX as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Travel photography camera
56
display is selfie friendly
no Timelapse function
low resolution (12MP)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than average (226 grams)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio TRYX Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB250F Landscape photography advice
28
good sized screen (3")
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (21mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Timelapse function
44
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Casio TRYX Vlogging factors
Samsung WB250F Vlogging factors
62
display is selfie friendly
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone socket
35
really wide (24mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (226g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB250F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Samsung WB250F
 Casio Exilim TRYXSamsung WB250F
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim TRYX Samsung WB250F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-01-05 2013-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21mm (1x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 8cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/8 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash settings no built-in flash -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 226 gr (0.50 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $689 $250